152). 3.

Does the writer clearly convey the main points and conclusions listed in the Journal Article?

In reality, given the exhaustive background and sometimes-abstruse reasoning presented by the author, it is tempting to readily agree with his analysis that workers in the United States are in jeopardy of losing all say in how they are treated in the workplace without ongoing oversight by a benign federal government that is only concerned about everyone's best interests. For example, Crain writes, "No . . . law affords workers a direct voice in how their day-to-day work lives are structured" (p. 153).

4.

Is the summary clear and easy to follow?

To his credit, Crain provides counter-arguments and examples of how both labor unions and businesses have exploited the employment climate to their advantage, but his primary thesis remains that workers will continue...

Moreover, workers can easily voice their views about the quality of the workplace by exercising their fundamental rights to find employment elsewhere -- after all, this is a free country.
References

Crain, M. (2011). An imminent hanging. ABA Journal of Labor & Employment Law, 26(2), 151-